When a traveler asks AI to recommend a boutique hotel, it returns a short list. Your property is either on it, or it isn't.

Most independent hotels don't know where they stand, or what AI actually says about them.

What does AI say about your hotel?

Showing up isn't enough on its own. I audited a property that had earned a Michelin Key. That recognition was on their website. It wasn't anywhere AI looks first. Ask ChatGPT about them and you get a reasonable description: boutique hotel, good location, thoughtful design. The Michelin Key never came up. Neither did the reason they earned it.

It's the same pattern across properties. A clarity problem, not a technology problem. And it's fixable.

Most independent properties have no way to check what AI says about them. Chains have corporate teams for this. You don't.

The AI Visibility Audit  ·  $1,250 flat

It tells you what major AI platforms currently say about your property. Where your real strengths aren't coming through. Where the description is incomplete or wrong. Which fixes to make and in what order, ranked by commercial impact, not technical complexity.

Each audit is specific to your property. This is not an automated tool. You walk away with a clear picture and a prioritized action list, written for an owner, not a developer.

No retainers. No implementation packages. One deliverable.

AI platforms don't recommend properties at random. They look for fit, confidence, and evidence. A property that matches what the traveler described, with consistent and specific information across enough sources, gets the recommendation. One that doesn't stays visible but doesn't get chosen.

Most properties have the fit. What breaks down is the evidence layer. The specific features, the guest profile, the reason someone picks this place over the one down the road. Often those things are on the website. But they're not on the platforms AI reads first, or they're described differently across sources, or they're buried in copy AI doesn't parse well. None of it comes through in a recommendation.

The audit identifies exactly where that breaks down. Not in general terms. For your property specifically. That's what makes the fix list actionable.

Sebbe Jones

I spent 15 years in fraud prevention. Building departments from scratch, writing the processes, developing the people who made real-time calls on incomplete data.

The framework for building a fraud department was always the same. Documentation first. Process second. Systems last. Not because the systems don't matter. Because systems don't fix broken processes. They magnify them. Every team that skipped ahead to the tools found that out.

Pattern recognition is pattern recognition.

AI visibility for hotels has the same failure mode. Most advice goes straight to the systems layer. Schema markup, Google Business Profiles, TripAdvisor listings. Good recommendations, but in the wrong order.

If a hotel's documentation is incomplete, or the platforms are telling different stories, AI sees the conflict and falls back to a category description. Boutique hotel. Good location. Thoughtful design. None of it enough to make someone choose you over the property down the road.

The audit starts at the documentation layer. That's where the signal actually breaks down. I'm good at finding that gap. It's not by accident.

More on LinkedIn ↗

What does AI say about your hotel?

Send me your property and location. I'll run a quick pre-screen and tell you where the gaps are.

You'll hear back within one business day.